NATIONAL NEWS
IPOB Condemns Appeal Court Ruling Upholding Proscription As ‘Rape Of Justice’
Abuja, Nigeria – The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has strongly condemned the Appeal Court’s decision to uphold the group’s proscription, describing it as a “rape of justice” and a flagrant disregard for Nigerian law.
In a press release issued by Comrade Emma Powerful, IPOB’s Media and Publicity Secretary, the movement accused Abuja courts of being influenced by “haters of IPOB” and purposefully undermining the rule of law.
Powerful argued that the initial ex-parte order, which banned IPOB nearly eight years ago, was a temporary measure that went beyond the legally mandated 14-day limit.
He also criticised the court’s reliance on the alleged threat to national security as justification for the proscription, claiming that no state of emergency had been declared and no public disorder attributed to IPOB existed to justify such action.
The press release emphasised several legal irregularities:
Violation of Due Process: IPOB claims that an ex-parte order cannot impose criminal liability, despite the fact that this was the basis for the initial proscription.
Lack of Presidential Authorisation: The proscription order, signed by the late Abba Kyari, President Buhari’s Chief of Staff, lacked the legally required signatures of the President and his Vice President, Yemi Osinbajo.
According to Powerful, Kyari and former Attorney General Abubakar Malami made a deliberate attempt to circumvent proper procedures.
Ignoring the Constitutional Mandate: The IPOB claims that the Appeal Court’s decision prioritises a flawed piece of legislation over the supreme law of the land, the Nigerian Constitution, which guarantees freedom of association.
Powerful accused Fulani judges of bias, claiming a pattern of disregarding the rule of law in IPOB-related cases.
He criticises the use of a separate case (Asari Dokubo’s bail application) to justify the threat to national security claim, and he questions the shift from a threat to national security claim based on Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s public appearances to labelling IPOB as a terrorist organisation in the absence of evidence of terrorist activity.
The press release concludes by reiterating IPOB’s intention to challenge the Appeal Court’s decision through legal means, vowing to sue anyone who refers to IPOB as a proscribed organisation without sufficient evidence of terrorist activity.
The movement continues to pursue self-determination through legal channels.
-
CRIME3 years ago
PSC Dismisses DCP Abba Kyari, To Be Prosecuted Over Alleged $1.1m Fraud
-
FEATURED3 years ago
2022 Will Brighten Possibility Of Osinbajo Presidency, Says TPP
-
FEATURED2 years ago
Buhari’s Ministers, CEOs Should Be Held Accountable Along With Emefiele, Says Timi Frank
-
BUSINESS & ECONOMY1 year ago
Oyedemi Reigns As 2023’s Real Estate Humanitarian Of The Year
-
SPORTS1 year ago
BREAKING: Jürgen Klopp Quits Liverpool As Manager At End Of Season
-
SPORTS2 years ago
Could Liverpool Afford Kylian Mbappe For €200 million? Wages, Transfer Fee
-
ENTERTAINMENT2 years ago
Veteran Nigerian Musician, Basil Akalonu Dies At 72
-
FEATURED1 year ago
Tribunal Judgement: Peter Obi Warns Of Vanishing Electoral Jurisprudence, Heads To Supreme Court
-
BUSINESS & ECONOMY1 year ago
Oyedemi Bags ‘Next Bulls Award’ As BusinessDay Celebrates Top 25 CEOs/ Business Leaders
-
FEATURED3 years ago
2023 Presidency: South East PDP Aspirants Unite, Demand Party Ticket For Zone